Introduction:
In India, the legal landscape concerning animals is a mix of ancient traditions, modern legislation, and judicial interpretations. While animals have historically held significant cultural and religious importance in India, their welfare and protection have often been overlooked. However, over the years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to safeguard animals from cruelty and exploitation. This article aims to explore the key animal laws in India and highlight landmark judgments that have shaped the legal framework for animal protection in the country.
To learn more about the topic, read the blog till the end, and if there lies any more doubt, feel free to reach out to us at; https://thelegalshots.com/legal-opinion/
Kerala: Pregnant elephant dies after consuming pineapple stuffed with crackers
The pregnant elephant’s killing has prompted swift action from authorities, with over 250 personnel from the state’s forest department conducting searches in private estates on the forest fringes. The combing operation aims to gather clues and identify suspects involved in the incident. Additionally, a separate probe by the state Crime Branch is underway to investigate the use of explosives that led to the elephant’s death.
The heartbreaking nature of the incident has garnered widespread attention, both nationally and internationally. Mohan Krishnan, a section forest officer who attempted to rescue the injured elephant, shared a heartfelt note on social media, bringing the issue to public consciousness. The post-mortem conducted by Dr. David Abraham revealed the extent of the elephant’s injuries and the tragic discovery of its pregnancy.
In response to the incident, Union Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar has expressed concern and assured that stern action will be taken against the culprits. However, attempts to politicize the tragedy and spread misinformation have been condemned by leaders from Kerala’s Left and Congress-led alliances. Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has emphasized the need to prioritize justice for the slain elephant while rejecting attempts to fuel hate campaigns and bigotry.
The killing of the pregnant elephant serves as a grim reminder of the urgent need to address human-wildlife conflicts and combat animal cruelty. It highlights the importance of implementing stricter laws and regulations to protect wildlife and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions. As efforts continue to bring justice for the slain elephant, it is essential to promote compassion and empathy towards all living beings, fostering a harmonious relationship between humans and wildlife.
Various legislation for protecting animal rights
Various legislation has been enacted by the Government of India to safeguard the interests of animals, recognizing their voicelessness and the importance of supporting their rights, akin to human rights. These legislative measures serve to protect animal welfare and ensure their fair treatment. Below, we discuss several key pieces of legislation aimed at protecting animal rights:
The Constitution and Animal Protection:
India, like many other countries, has laws pertaining to animal welfare, with provisions aimed at protecting and safeguarding the rights of animals. The Constitution of India, as the supreme law of the land, addresses the protection of animal rights under Fundamental Duties and the Directive Principles of State Policy.
- Under Article 21 of the Constitution, the term ‘life’ encompasses all forms of life, including animal life, which is deemed essential for human life. Additionally, the right to dignity and fair treatment is significant in the context of animal rights.
- Article 48A of the Constitution mandates that the state shall endeavor to protect and improve the environment, safeguarding the country’s forests and wildlife.
- Article 51A(g) emphasizes that every citizen has a fundamental duty to safeguard and improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers, and animals, as well as to have compassion for living creatures.
- While these Constitutional provisions are not directly enforceable by courts, they provide a foundation for legislation, policies, and laws aimed at furthering animal protection at both the central and state levels.
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960:
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (PCA Act) serves as the primary legislation for the prevention of cruelty towards animals in India. The Act defines cruelty and outlines various provisions to protect animals from unnecessary suffering. Some key provisions of the PCA Act include the prohibition of cruel practices such as beating, kicking, overloading, and confining animals in a manner that causes them unnecessary pain or suffering.
The tragic killing of a pregnant elephant in Palakkad district, Kerala, has sparked outrage and led to efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice. The incident, which came to light on May 30, involved the elephant consuming a fruit laced with explosives, resulting in severe injuries and eventual death. While one person has been arrested in connection with the incident, efforts are ongoing to apprehend others involved.
The use of snares laid by villagers for wild animals, such as wild boars and pigs, is common across forest areas in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. These snares often lead to unintended consequences, such as the death of wild elephants. Despite efforts by forest departments to combat such practices, incidents like these continue to occur, posing a significant threat to wildlife.
The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972
The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 serves as a cornerstone of wildlife conservation efforts in India, encompassing a wide range of provisions aimed at safeguarding the country’s diverse flora and fauna. This comprehensive legislation prohibits various activities detrimental to wildlife, including killing, trapping, poaching, or harming any wild animal or bird.
One significant aspect of the Act is its establishment of a broad list of endangered wildlife species, providing crucial protection for vulnerable populations. Additionally, the Act extends its provisions across different states and regions, ensuring uniform protection measures nationwide.
The Act mandates the formation of wildlife advisory boards in each state to address wildlife conservation challenges effectively. These boards play a vital role in advising and implementing measures for the protection of wildlife habitats and species.
Under the Act, hunting, defined to include actions like poisoning, killing, or trapping wild animals, is strictly prohibited. It also prohibits activities such as disturbing the nests or eggs of birds and reptiles, recognizing the importance of protecting wildlife at all life stages.
While the Act imposes stringent restrictions on hunting, it allows for certain exceptions under specific circumstances outlined in Section 11. Moreover, it grants the central and state governments the authority to designate areas as “restricted” for the establishment of wildlife sanctuaries and national parks, furthering conservation efforts. The Act also regulates the transportation of wildlife, prohibiting the movement of animals, birds, or plants without proper authorization from designated wildlife authorities. This measure aims to curb illegal trade and trafficking of protected species.
Furthermore, the Act prohibits the purchase of wild animals from dealers without a valid license, thereby preventing the exploitation and commercialization of wildlife.
Landmark Judgments:
1. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja & Ors. (2014): In this case, the Supreme Court of India laid down guidelines regarding the treatment of animals in cattle markets and during transportation. The court banned the use of bulls and bullocks for events like Jallikattu and bullock cart races, citing cruelty and violation of the PCA Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of compassion towards animals and the need to prevent their exploitation for human entertainment.
2. Animal Welfare Board of India v. People for Elimination of Stray Troubles & Ors. (2009): This case addressed the issue of stray dog culling in Kerala. The Supreme Court reiterated that killing stray dogs was inhumane and ineffective in controlling their population. Instead, the court emphasized the importance of sterilization and vaccination programs to manage stray dog populations. The judgment highlighted the need for compassionate and scientific approaches to address human-animal conflicts.
3. Gauri Maulekhi v. Union of India & Ors. (2014): In this case, the Supreme Court banned the import of cosmetic products tested on animals. The judgment recognized the inherent cruelty involved in animal testing for cosmetic purposes and emphasized the need to promote cruelty-free alternatives. This landmark decision signaled India’s commitment to animal welfare and aligned with global efforts to eliminate animal testing in the cosmetics industry.
4. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja & Ors. (2016): Building upon its earlier judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the ban on Jallikattu and bullock cart races, emphasizing the importance of preventing cruelty towards animals. The court recognized that such traditional practices often resulted in the abuse and exploitation of animals, contravening the principles of compassion and welfare enshrined in the PCA Act and the Constitution.
5. People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India v. Union of India (2016): In this case, the Supreme Court banned the use of bulls in performances like bullock cart races across India. The judgment reiterated the cruelty inherent in such practices and emphasized the need to protect animals from exploitation for human entertainment. The court’s decision reflected a growing awareness of animal rights and welfare issues in India.
Experiments on Animals:
Animal experimentation is a contentious issue where non-human animals are used in laboratories to conduct tests, experiments, and research for various biological problems. These experiments often involve subjecting animals to distress, pain, and even death, all in the pursuit of benefiting humans. Despite the potential successes of such research for human medical advancements, it raises ethical concerns as it violates animals’ right to life.
In India, efforts have been made to curtail animal testing, particularly in cosmetic industries. On May 23, 2014, India took a significant step by banning animal testing for cosmetics through the Drugs and Cosmetics (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2014. This move marked India as the first country in South Asia to take a firm stance against animal cruelty in cosmetic testing. However, animal testing for drugs still persists, as there remains a legal requirement to test new drugs on animals before human trials.
Animal Fights:
Animal fights, such as dogfighting, cockfighting, and bullfighting, are illegal in India but remain prevalent, especially in rural areas. These cruel practices involve training animals to fight for the entertainment and financial gain of spectators, often resulting in severe injuries or death for the animals involved.
In the case of AWBI v. A Nagaraja (2014), the Supreme Court of India ruled against bull races like Jallikattu, recognizing the immense pain and stress inflicted upon the bulls. Despite the court’s decision, protests led to the Tamil Nadu government passing an ordinance permitting Jallikattu and similar events in certain areas. However, organizing, participating in, or inciting animal fights remains a crime under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
Manipulation of Genetics:
Genetic engineering of animals for human needs raises ethical concerns regarding animal welfare and the exploitation of living beings. Transgenic animals, created for higher productivity or specific traits, may suffer from health issues and reduced well-being. In India, while there is no specific law addressing animal cruelty related to genetic modification, regulations under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, govern genetically modified organisms and their products.
Circus:
Circuses, often marketed as entertainment, have a dark side where animals endure abuse and torture behind the scenes. Animals are forced to perform dangerous acts, such as jumping through fire hoops or riding bicycles, under threat of punishment. In India, the Performing Animals (Registration) Rules, 2001, regulate circuses, requiring mandatory licensing for performances involving animals. Additionally, the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, prohibits the use of wild animals in performances.
Illegal Trading/Smuggling of Animals:
The illegal trading and smuggling of animals pose significant threats to wildlife conservation efforts. In Gauri Maulekhi v. Union of India and Ors. (2016), the Supreme Court of India prohibited the illegal trafficking of cattle to Nepal for the Gadhimai festival, emphasizing the need to curb such activities.
Sexual Harassment:
Previously, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, criminalized sexual offenses against animals. However, the Supreme Court’s decision in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) decriminalized unnatural offenses under Section 377, inadvertently impacting animal rights by removing provisions related to sexual abuses against animals. While the intent was to protect LGBTQ+ rights, it highlights the interconnectedness of various legal provisions and their implications for animal welfare.
In conclusion, while India has made strides in legislating against animal cruelty and exploitation, challenges remain in enforcing existing laws and addressing emerging issues such as genetic manipulation and illegal trading. Continued efforts are needed to strengthen animal protection measures and promote a more compassionate society towards all living beings.
Conclusion:
India has made significant strides in the legal protection of animals, with landmark judgments setting important precedents for animal welfare. However, there is still much work to be done to ensure the effective implementation of animal laws and to foster a culture of compassion towards animals. As citizens, it is our duty to uphold the principles of animal rights and welfare enshrined in the Constitution and to advocate for the humane treatment of animals in all spheres of life. By recognizing the intrinsic value of animals and respecting their welfare, we can create a more just and compassionate society for all living beings.
To understand more such complex law in simple ways, stay connected with www.thelegalshots.com .
If doubts still persist, contact our Legal Experts at https://thelegalshots.com/legal-opinion/
